Monthly Archives: March 2006

This is the view from inside the ‘Art House’ during DrawingI. The actual drawing is going on display in the Vise Library soon. Also, it isn’t really curved like that in real life, I’m afraid the camera adds ten extra pounds.

This is the view from inside the ‘Art House’ during DrawingI. The actual drawing is going on display in the Vise Library soon. Also, it isn’t really curved like that in real life, I’m afraid the camera adds ten extra pounds.

“The captain spoke quietly. He wondered where all the people had gone, and they had been, and who their kings were, and how they had died. And he wondered, quietly aloud, how they had built this city to last the ages through, and had they ever come to Earth? And had they loved and hated similar loves and hates, and done similar silly things when silly things were done?

“Nobody moved. The moons held and froze them; the wind beat slowly around them.

“‘Lord Byron,” said Jeff Spender.
“Lord who?” The captain turned and regarded him.
“Lord Byron, a nineteenth century poet. He wrote a poem a long time ago that fits this city and how the Martians must feel, if there’s anything left of them to feel. It might have been written by the last Martian poet.”

“The men stood motionless, their shadows under them.

“The captain said, “How does the poem go, Spender?”

“So we’ll go no more a-roving
So late into the night,
Though the heart be still as loving,
And the moon be still as bright.”

“The city was grey and high and motionless. The men’s faces were turned in the light.

“For the sword outwears its sheath,
And the soul outwears the breast,
And the heart must pause to breathe,
And love itself must rest.

“Though the night was made for loving,
And the day returns too soon,
Yet we’ll no more go a-roving
By the light of the moon.”

“Without a word the Earth Men stood in the center of the city. It was a clear night. There was not a sound except the wind. At their feet lay a tile court worked into the shapes of ancient animals and people.”

The lengthy preceding quote comes from Ray Bradbury’s The Martian Chronicles. Previous to reading The Martian Chronicles, I had read Byron poetry for school, but I closed the book unimpressed by him. But Bradbury by his book taught me how to appreciate Lord Byron’s poetry. A poem of a break-up or some other affair, gains a special relevance by being placed in a story by a character’s insight into the collapse of a foreign civilization.
Another aspect of Byron’s poetry is his quotability. It’s so easy for Spender to recite the poem, as Byron’s poems roll easily off the (English speaking) tongue. Even if the poem rhymes poorly, its rhythms make it unnoticable. Ease in recitation coupled with Byron’s charm means his poems fulfill one of the great purposes of poetry: charming girls. Speaking words like:

There be none of Beauty’s daughters
with a magic like thee,
like music on the waters,
is thy sweet voice to me,
As if the sound were causing
The charmed oceans pausing,
The waves lie still and gleaming,
The lulled winds seem dreaming.”
Are much more pleasing and tasteful than “Is it just you, or is it hot in here.”

Part Two

George Gordon, Lord Byron was one of younger poets of Romantic rebellion, closer in age to P.B. Shelley and John Keats than to the William Wordsworth or Samuel Taylor Coleridge, the rebellion’s leaders. These poets claimed Shakespeare as one of their own, seeking to restore his vitality and red-bloodedness that had been lost in subsequent generations of poets. All five of these men were likewise inspired by the poetry of William Blake, an old man when Coleridge and Wordsworth came of age. Their inspiration did not come totally from other poets, but likewise came from the American and French revolutions, and sought similar revolutions in literature. Each man had their various muses and themes. Coleridge had religious ecstasy and opium, Wordsworth inspired by Nature, to Shelley exaltation, Keats contemplating the beauties of Greek culture, and Byron had Milton’s Lucifer (in his Don Juan cantos) and women (you could call him a Don Juan). Romantics, now synonymous with romance, yet Byron was the only great writer of love poems among them. And the affection was returned to him, causing scandal and forcing him to leave England for good. Byron died on April, the 19th 1824 in Greece after being bled by doctors. Reason for being in Greece, was he was leading a group of Greek rebels against the Ottoman empire, which then was ruling Greece.

Part 3

I don’t think I want to imitate Byron’s life or lifestyle, but I find his poetry to be remarkable, and certainly worth reading. He, along with the rest of the Romantics have seemingly fallen out of favor. Wordsworth is marginalized, Keats is treated with cute condescension, Shelley is diagnosed with Messiah complexes and Byron’s poetry is rejected because of his character. This is a misguided Victorian argument for ignorance. It is a ad hominem (to the man) attack, which is a logical fallacy trying to reject men’s words by denigrating their character.

She walks in beauty, like the night
Of cloudless climes and starry skies;
And all that’s best of dark and bright
Meet in her aspect and her eyes:
Thus mellow’d to that tender light
Which heaven to gaudy day denies.
One shade the more, one ray the less,
Had half impair’d the nameless grace
Which waves in every raven tress,
Or softly lightens o’er her face;
Where thoughts serenely sweet express
How pure, how dear their dwelling-place.

And on that cheek, and o’er that brow,
So soft, so calm, yet eloquent,
The smiles that win, the tints that glow,
But tell of days in goodness spent,
A mind at peace with all below,
A heart whose love is innocent!

I hereby institute Monday Poets. Its purpose will be to either provide a variety of poets and their poems you may not otherwise read and/or to show appreciation towards far greater poets than my rank self.

Many poetry lovers are deeply in love with Emily Dickinson, but my crush is on Anna Akhmatova. This is one reason she is first poetin this series. Her poetry is marked by intimacy, and she was noted for her royal form.
Akhmatova (akh-ma-ta-va) was born in 1889 outside Odessa, Russia (now Ukraine) and died March 5th 1966; she began to write poetry in 1909 after marrying poet Nikolai Gumilev. Her pre-war poetry is of great importance, but it is the poems she wrote after World War I and the Bolshevik revolution that garnered greater attention. One was entirely negative, the persuecution of her and her family by Stalin. Second was her poem “Courage” that screwed Moscow’s will to the sticking point. Third were her bitter poems of persecuetion and lament such as “A Poem without a Hero” which went unpublished under Stalin. Like Pushkin’s poetry, her poems are held as standards of Russia which are unquestionable. So without further words I present her poems “Pushkin” and “Dante”

Pushkin
A swarthy youth rambled
by the forlorn lakeshore.
A century passes, and we hear
his crackle on the path.

Pine needles, thick thorny,
bury the stumps of the trees…
here lay his tricorn hat,
his dog-eared verse by Parny

— –1911
Dante
Even after his death he did not return
to the city that had nursed him.
Going away, this man did not look back.
To him I sing this song.
Torches, night, a last embrace,
outside in her streets the mob howling.
He sent her a curse from hell
and in heaven could not forget her.
But never, in a pentitent’s shirt,
did he walk barefoot with lighted candle
through his beloved Florence,
perfidious, base, and irremediably home.
— – 1936

(“Puskin” and “Dante” trans. by Stanley Kunitz with Max Hayward. Boston. Houghton Mifflin, 1967.
Portait of Anna Akhmatova by Nathan Altman, 1914)

Even thought I can’t see this picture (because of the Web filters here at WorldView), I’ll post another picture from my computer’s archives of unposted old people. (I have to work from the archives because I have no idea where our scanner is, not that I’ve been very creative recently anyway.)

Can you guys see anything?